Runboard.com
You're welcome.

runboard.com       Sign up (learn about it) | Sign in (lost password?)


Page:  1  2  3 

 
Rocketman11 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Banned user
Global user

Registered: 02-2018
Posts: 1245
Karma: -19 (+0/-19)
Reply | Quote
Re: Hey Patango!!!!!


Part 2.


1960s, the South began a major demographic shift from Democratic to Republican dominance. Many believe that this shift was motivated by racism. While it is certainly true that many Southern racists abandoned the Democratic Party over its new support for racial equality and integration, the notion that they would flock to the Republican Party -- which was a century ahead of the Democrats on those issues -- makes no sense whatsoever.
Yet virtually every liberal, when pressed on the matter, will inevitably claim that the parties "switched," and most racist Democrats became Republicans! In their minds, this historical ju jitsu maneuver apparently transfers all the past sins of the Democrats (slavery, the KKK, Jim Crow laws, etc.) onto the Republicans and all the past virtues of the Republicans (e.g., ending slavery) onto the Democrats! That's quite a feat!
It is true that Barry Goldwater's opposition to the Civil Rights Act of 1964 probably attracted some racist Democrats to the Republican Party. However, Goldwater was not a racist -- at least not an overt racist like so many Southern Democrats of the time, such as George Wallace and Bull Connor. He publicly professed racial equality, and his opposition to the 1964 Act was based on principled grounds of states rights. In any case, his libertarian views were out of step with the mainstream, and he lost the 1964 Presidential election to LBJ in a landslide.
But Goldwater's opposition to the 1964 Civil Rights Act provided liberals an opening to tar the Republican Party as racist, and they have tenaciously repeated that label so often over the years that it is now the conventional wisdom among liberals. But it is really nothing more than an unsubstantiated myth -- a convenient political lie. If the Republican Party was any more racist than the Democratic Party even in 1964, why did a higher percentage of Republicans than Democrats in both houses of Congress vote for the 1964 Civil Rights Act? The idea that Goldwater's vote on the 1964 Civil Rights Act trumps a century of history of the Republican Party is ridiculous, to say the least.
Every political party has its racists, but the notion that Republicans are more racist than Democrats or any other party is based on nothing more than a constant drumbeat of unsubstantiated innuendo and assertions by Leftists, constantly echoed by the liberal media. It is a classic example of a Big Lie that becomes "true" simply by virtue of being repeated so many times.
A more likely explanation for the long-term shift from Democratic to Republican dominance in the South was the perception, fair or not, that the Democratic Party had rejected traditional Christian religious values and embraced radical secularism. That includes its hardline support for abortion, its rejection of prayer in public schools, its promotion of the gay agenda, and many other issues.
In the 1960s the Democratic Party changed its strategy for dealing with African Americans. Thanks to earlier Republican initiatives on civil rights, blatant racial oppression was no longer a viable political option. Whereas before that time Southern Democrats had overtly and proudly segregated and terrorized blacks, the national Democratic Party decided instead to be more subtle and get them as dependent on government as possible. As LBJ so elegantly put it (in a famous moment of candor that was recorded for posterity), "I'll have those !@#$ voting Democratic for the next 200 years." At the same time, the Democrats started a persistent campaign of lies and innuendo, falsely equating any opposition to their welfare state with racism.
From a purely cynical political perspective, the Democratic strategy of black dependence has been extremely effective. LBJ knew exactly what he was doing. African Americans routinely vote well over 90 percent Democratic for fear that Republicans will cut their government benefits and welfare programs. And what is the result? Before LBJ's Great Society welfare programs, the black illegitimacy rate was as low as 23 percent, but now it has more than tripled to 72 percent.
Most major American city governments have been run by liberal Democrats for decades, and most of those cities have large black sections that are essentially dysfunctional anarchies. Cities like Detroit are overrun by gangs and drug dealers, with burned out homes on every block in some areas. The land values are so low due to crime, blight, and lack of economic opportunity that condemned homes are not even worth rebuilding. Who wants to build a home in an urban war zone? Yet they keep electing liberal Democrats -- and blaming "racist" Republicans for their problems!
Washington DC is another city that has been dominated by liberal Democrats for decades. It spends more per capita on students than almost any other city in the world, yet it has some of the worst academic achievement anywhere and is a drug-infested hellhole. Barack Obama would not dream of sending his own precious daughters to the DC public schools, of course -- but he assures us that those schools are good enough for everyone else. In fact, Obama was instrumental in killing a popular and effective school voucher program in DC, effectively killing hopes for many poor black families trapped in those dysfunctional public schools. His allegiance to the teachers unions apparently trumps his concern for poor black families.
A strong argument could also be made that Democratic support for perpetual affirmative action is racist. It is, after all, the antithesis of Martin Luther King's dream of a color-blind society. Not only is it "reverse racism," but it is based on the premise that African Americans are incapable of competing in the free market on a level playing field. In other words, it is based on the notion of white supremacy, albeit "benevolent" white supremacy rather than the openly hostile white supremacy of the pre-1960s Democratic Party.
The next time someone claims that Republicans are racist and Democrats are not, don't fall for it.

---
quote:

CurtisG wrote:

Quote, Curtis G.



3/8/2018, 2:38 pm Link to this post Send Email to Rocketman11   Send PM to Rocketman11 Blog
 
stonesurfdog5 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user
Global user

Registered: 11-2008
Posts: 24068
Karma: 33 (+106/-73)
Reply | Quote
Re: Hey Patango!!!!!


quote:

"I guess that is why the black community was brutalized, raped, murdered, had zero civil rights, had their houses, schools, churches and towns burnt down, continued to work and live in slave conditions, and couldn't vote from 1900 to the 1960's and beyond."

Yup, all done by your hero liberal democrats.
 
-CHIEF LIAR



Anyone else NOT SURPRISED that a !@#$ liar like Elk is also lying about the political makeup of the KKK.

The KKK was/is a conservative evangelical organization. Not a single "liberal democrat" in the bunch (as Elk the liar has claimed)...never has been, never will be!

The Republican party was founded by the PROGRESSIVE LIBERALS OF THEIR TIME, the party of Lincoln.

The KKK was founded by conservative evangelicals and they continue to identify that way to this day, aligning with the REPUBLICAN PARTY.

NOT ALL CONSERVATIVES ARE RACIST, BUT ALMOST ALL RACISTS ARE CONSERVATIVE AND REPUBLICAN!




Last edited by stonesurfdog5, 3/8/2018, 3:20 pm
3/8/2018, 3:17 pm Link to this post Send Email to stonesurfdog5   Send PM to stonesurfdog5
 
Rocketman11 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Banned user
Global user

Registered: 02-2018
Posts: 1245
Karma: -19 (+0/-19)
Reply | Quote
Re: Hey Patango!!!!!


Stone, I see U didn't read my post. Not surprising, it is long and no pictures. So U remain in U little liberal cubby hole. That's fine by me friend, if U wanna remain ignorant.


CHIEF R MAN

---
quote:

CurtisG wrote:

Quote, Curtis G.



3/8/2018, 3:29 pm Link to this post Send Email to Rocketman11   Send PM to Rocketman11 Blog
 
stonesurfdog5 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user
Global user

Registered: 11-2008
Posts: 24068
Karma: 33 (+106/-73)
Reply | Quote
Re: Hey Patango!!!!!


quote:

Rocketman11 wrote:

Stone, I see U didn't read my post. Not surprising, it is long and no pictures. So U remain in U little liberal cubby hole. That's fine by me friend, if U wanna remain ignorant.


CHIEF R MAN



Forget the article you lying moochie [sign in to see URL] about your own words???

quote:

I guess that is why the black community was brutalized, raped, murdered, had zero civil rights, had their houses, schools, churches and towns burnt down, continued to work and live in slave conditions, and couldn't vote from 1900 to the 1960's and beyond."

Yup, all done by your hero liberal democrats.
 
-CHIEF LIAR
3/8/2018, 3:32 pm Link to this post Send Email to stonesurfdog5   Send PM to stonesurfdog5
 
Patango Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user
Global user

Registered: 11-2008
Location: Mozambique , Timbuktu
Posts: 39257
Karma: -25 (+136/-161)
Reply | Quote
Re: Hey Patango!!!!!


quote:

Rocketman11 wrote:

Yup, all done by your hero liberal democrats.




From the republican loser who gets his board shut down for overt KKK bigotry.

Dems all know elk worships people like robert e lee, the dixiecrat.

And now in 2018, elk is sucking the ass of another scumbag NYC democrat.

Trump has spent years kissing Hillary and other Dems asses.

 Clinton, the Democratic front-runner and former New York senator received donations from both Donald Sr. and son Donald Trump Jr. on separate occasions in 2002, 2005, 2006 and 2007, according to state and federal disclosure records.

Trump has also been generous with the Clinton Foundation, donating at least $100,000, according to the non-profit.

In another sign of their closeness, Clinton attended Trump’s 2005 wedding at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago. Clinton had front-pew seating.


[sign in to see URL]

If GOP mooch elk had shown up there, donald would have called security.


elk is not just mentally ill, he is "willfully" mentally ill. He volunteers to be mentally ill for (D) Trump and his political party.


--Log in or sign up to see linked image content--

Last edited by Patango, 3/8/2018, 5:01 pm


---

3/8/2018, 4:39 pm Link to this post Send Email to Patango   Send PM to Patango
 
Rocketman11 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Banned user
Global user

Registered: 02-2018
Posts: 1245
Karma: -19 (+0/-19)
Reply | Quote
Re: Hey Patango!!!!!


Stone, Once again I must question your reading comprehension. If you will notice below the word "quote", that means they are someone else's words, not mine. In this case I was quoting Patango.


quote:

I guess that is why the black community was brutalized, raped, murdered, had zero civil rights, had their houses, schools, churches and towns burnt down, continued to work and live in slave conditions, and couldn't vote from 1900 to the 1960's and beyond."

---
quote:

CurtisG wrote:

Quote, Curtis G.



3/8/2018, 4:42 pm Link to this post Send Email to Rocketman11   Send PM to Rocketman11 Blog
 
stonesurfdog5 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user
Global user

Registered: 11-2008
Posts: 24068
Karma: 33 (+106/-73)
Reply | Quote
Re: Hey Patango!!!!!


Wow LIAR, you really are dumber than a bag of hammers.

I'm talking about your lying words, nobody else's, just your words.

You type the following in reference to what Patango CORRECTLY pointed out in the context of the KKK?

Yup, all done by your hero liberal democrats.

-Lair

-Moocher

-Illiterate dumb-ass

That's quite a loser resume you have.
3/8/2018, 5:05 pm Link to this post Send Email to stonesurfdog5   Send PM to stonesurfdog5
 
Patango Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user
Global user

Registered: 11-2008
Location: Mozambique , Timbuktu
Posts: 39257
Karma: -25 (+136/-161)
Reply | Quote
Re: Hey Patango!!!!!


Exactly, Dog.

Dog quoted you, elk-scat.

quote:

Rocketman11 wrote:

Yup, all done by your hero liberal democrats.




Yes, Curtis. This passes as "debate" like Trump passes as a qualified president. As in NOT AT ALL.

He went from still pretending to not be elk this morning, to groveling and admitting it this afternoon.

I'm just glad he is not my neighbor.

He even scared off shar. Elk must be creepy in person.
 

---

3/8/2018, 5:10 pm Link to this post Send Email to Patango   Send PM to Patango
 
Rocketman11 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Banned user
Global user

Registered: 02-2018
Posts: 1245
Karma: -19 (+0/-19)
Reply | Quote
Re: Hey Patango!!!!!


The long post with no pics. proves what I have said is true.


I have no quarrels or animosities with either side in the Civil War. No heroes or villains either. That war was over a long time ago. I did have a Great Grandfather from Missouri that did fight for the North for about 3 years though.

---
quote:

CurtisG wrote:

Quote, Curtis G.



3/8/2018, 5:44 pm Link to this post Send Email to Rocketman11   Send PM to Rocketman11 Blog
 
CurtisG Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Administrator
Global user

Registered: 05-2011
Posts: 19728
Karma: 28 (+46/-18)
Reply | Quote
Re: Hey Patango!!!!!


Yeah Shar said he was a scary guy... who mooched off of him the whole time he was there. His wife was terrified of this seemingly homeless old !@#$ who just showed up and started freeloading.

3/8/2018, 5:47 pm Link to this post Send Email to CurtisG   Send PM to CurtisG Blog
 


Add a reply

Page:  1  2  3 





You are not logged in (login)
^ Back to top ^